[prompt-analysis] Copilot PR Prompt Analysis - 2026-09-03 #58300
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot PR Prompt Pattern Analysis. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #58606. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🤖 Copilot PR Prompt Pattern Analysis - 2026-09-03
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days
Total PRs: 1000 | Merged: 844 (84.4%) | Closed: 147 (14.7%) | Open: 9 (0.9%)
Prompt Categories and Success Rates
Note: PR categorization is dominated by "bug fix" style prompts (81.6% of the sample), since most Copilot tasks in this repo are framed as fixing/resolving an issue. Security/CVE-related prompts were split out as their own bucket given their materially lower success rate.
Prompt Analysis
✅ Successful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in merged PRs:
workflow,run,actions,copilot,agent,sub/chef/sous(internal codenames),gptadd,implement,create,support) had the highest success rate (90.3%) of all categories.Example successful prompts:
❌ Unsuccessful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in closed PRs:
issue,cve,report,engine,call— closed PRs skew toward vulnerability/CVE remediation and workflow-engine internals.Example unsuccessful prompts:
Key Insights
Recommendations
Historical Trends
Trend: Merge rate has held steady in a narrow 83.9%–84.4% band over the past 4 days of tracked data — no material shift in overall Copilot PR success rate. Bug-fix prompts remain the dominant category by volume every day, consistent with this repo's issue-driven workflow.
Generated by Copilot PR Prompt Analysis (Run: 33803610906)
All reactions