You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1,000 issues analyzed — 222 open (22%), 778 closed (78%). All 1,000 issues in the analyzed window were created within the last 30 days, reflecting the extremely high automation throughput of this repository's daily agentic workflows.
Issue volume is dominated by automated workflow reports: 964 of 1,000 issues (96%) were authored by app/github-actions, and the top cluster theme ("test, report, pr") accounts for 366 issues alone. Closure is fast — the average time to close is just 0.57 days — indicating most automated reports are short-lived, superseded quickly by the next run. No issues are stale (30+ days without activity), consistent with the daily churn of this bot-driven issue stream. 135 issues (13.5%) lack labels and 953 (95.3%) lack assignees, both expected given the automated, ephemeral nature of most items.
View Full Details
📈 Issue Activity Trends
Opened and closed counts track closely day-over-day, with closures often matching or exceeding openings — a sign of the automation pipeline cleaning up superseded reports (e.g., "daily" and "WIP" issues) almost as fast as they are created. The 7-day averages show a steady, high-volume cadence rather than sharp spikes.
🏷️ Issue Clusters by Theme
Eight clusters emerged from TF-IDF + K-means analysis of titles and bodies. The largest cluster (366 issues, "test/report/pr") reflects recurring test and PR status reports; the second largest (271, "github/aw/main") captures general workflow-reference issues. Smaller clusters isolate niche automation themes like test parallelization, safe-outputs framework issues, and shared grader workflows.
Most unlabeled issues are transient "[WIP]" placeholder issues created by automation — consider auto-labeling these at creation time (e.g., automation, wip) to simplify future triage.
With 96% of issue volume coming from app/github-actions, consider periodic archival or auto-closing of superseded daily/WIP report issues to reduce noise for human reviewers.
The near-zero stale-issue count and sub-day close time suggest the bot-driven lifecycle is healthy; focus human attention on the small set of issues from real contributors (@lpcox, @sigh71, @v1v, @dsyme, etc.) which are more likely to need manual review.
Investigate the "cascade-suspected" label (89 issues) as a potential signal of cascading automation failures worth root-causing.
Report generated automatically by the Daily Issues Report workflow Data source: Last 1000 issues from github/gh-aw
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
1,000 issues analyzed — 222 open (22%), 778 closed (78%). All 1,000 issues in the analyzed window were created within the last 30 days, reflecting the extremely high automation throughput of this repository's daily agentic workflows.
Issue volume is dominated by automated workflow reports: 964 of 1,000 issues (96%) were authored by
app/github-actions, and the top cluster theme ("test, report, pr") accounts for 366 issues alone. Closure is fast — the average time to close is just 0.57 days — indicating most automated reports are short-lived, superseded quickly by the next run. No issues are stale (30+ days without activity), consistent with the daily churn of this bot-driven issue stream. 135 issues (13.5%) lack labels and 953 (95.3%) lack assignees, both expected given the automated, ephemeral nature of most items.View Full Details
📈 Issue Activity Trends
Opened and closed counts track closely day-over-day, with closures often matching or exceeding openings — a sign of the automation pipeline cleaning up superseded reports (e.g., "daily" and "WIP" issues) almost as fast as they are created. The 7-day averages show a steady, high-volume cadence rather than sharp spikes.
🏷️ Issue Clusters by Theme
Eight clusters emerged from TF-IDF + K-means analysis of titles and bodies. The largest cluster (366 issues, "test/report/pr") reflects recurring test and PR status reports; the second largest (271, "github/aw/main") captures general workflow-reference issues. Smaller clusters isolate niche automation themes like test parallelization, safe-outputs framework issues, and shared grader workflows.
Cluster Details
📊 Key Metrics
Volume Metrics
issues_analyzed): 1000 (Scope: Last 1000 issues)open_issues): 222 (22.2%)closed_issues): 778 (77.8%)Time-Based Metrics
issues_opened_7d): 1000issues_opened_30d): 1000issues_closed_30d): 778Triage Metrics
issues_without_labels): 135issues_without_assignees): 953stale_issues): 0🏆 Top Labels
👥 Most Active Authors
@app/github-actions@lpcox@sigh71@v1v@dsyme@ilja@kkruel8100@JaganGopalkrish@AnandhaSivam-00@dsfacciniStale Issues (No Activity 30+ Days)
None found — all issues in the analyzed window have had activity within the last 30 days.
Unlabeled Issues (sample)
📝 Recommendations
automation,wip) to simplify future triage.app/github-actions, consider periodic archival or auto-closing of superseded daily/WIP report issues to reduce noise for human reviewers.@lpcox,@sigh71,@v1v,@dsyme, etc.) which are more likely to need manual review.Report generated automatically by the Daily Issues Report workflow
Data source: Last 1000 issues from github/gh-aw
All reactions