Skip to content

Does PER 3.0 has an issue with "very complex" example in section 2.5? #131

Description

@levdovlatov

Hey, everyone!

Just noticed the way how "very complex" example is being put in 2.5:

Image

I would think it is a little bit illogical, because it violates of how we're formatting multiline arguments for functions, see 4.5:

Image

Another example is the same 2.5 section:

function somethingWithReflection(
    \ReflectionObject
    |\ReflectionClass
    |\ReflectionMethod
    |\ReflectionParameter
    |\ReflectionProperty $reflect
): object|null {
        // ...
}

That's why I suspect it is just a typo, and correct example for "veryComplex" would be:

function veryComplex(
    array
    |(ArrayAccess&Traversable)
    |(Traversable&Countable) $input
): ArrayAccess&Traversable {
    // ...
}

WDYT about it?

Feel free to ask me to create PR if my assumptions are correct 🙌

Best regards

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions